Photo not found

Sunday Salon
with Greg Fallis

Hendrik Kerstens


In the 17th century Dutch painters began to create informal paintings that focused on the features and/or expressions of anonymous people. These were called tronies. Although a tronie showed a person’s face, it wasn’t considered to be a portrait. A portrait, in that era, was a commissioned painting that displayed an often idealized likeness of a person of a certain social position. A portrait was almost always entitled with the subject’s name and was intended to be preserved for posterity. After all, a person who could afford to have a portrait painted was a person of stature and their portrait, even if it appeared informal, was an expression of their social status.

Kerstens3

A tronie, on the other hand, wasn’t a commissioned work. Rather, they were the painter’s informal personal projects. They gave the painter an opportunity to experiment, to work on different sorts of facial expressions, to try new techniques. Tronies, unlike commissioned portraits, were generally given generic titles, like Rembrandt’s An Oriental or Vermeer’s Girl with a Pearl Earring.

In 1995 Dutch photographer Hendrik Kerstens began a series of tronies featuring his daughter Paula. Although the individual images are given generic titles (in keeping with the tronie tradition), the entire series is named for his daughter: Paula Pictures. This series won the prestigious PANL Award (Photographers Association of the Netherlands).

Kerstens2

Paula was, in effect, the model of greatest convenience. As his daughter, she was almost always available. It was his great luck to father a child with such a classic Dutch face. Although Kerstens has photographed other people, his best work — and certainly his most successful gallery showings — generally features Paula. Despite the fact that she’s his daughter, Kerstens has stated he can never truly know her — neither as a parent nor as a photographer. But he can approach her as a photographer and with a photographer’s eye.

Kerstens frequently re-creates the sorts of poses and the angles of illumination found in the work of the Dutch master painters. There is a subtlety of light at work here, a delicacy of tone that is altogether painterly. Kerstens’ interest in 17th century painting is grounded in its celebration of the ordinary. He says it “can be read as a description of everyday life, as opposed to the paintings of the Italian Renaissance, which usually tell a story.” He is also intrigued by the pre-eminence of craftsmanship over sentiment during that era, and his photographs reflect that. His work is almost scholarly in approach; cool, detached, disciplined.

The nude image below is as much about light and line as it is about the human body. Kerstens focuses on the technical aspects of the image, which results in a sort of impersonal, austere beauty. The way the subject’s face and body are illuminated is as studied and formal as the studies of light found in still life paintings.

Kerstens7

Even when modern artifacts are included, the images retain an aura of antiquity. Through his control of light Kerstens is able to turn a hoodie into a wimple, some bubble wrap into a traditional Dutch bonnet. The photograph below is almost like a lesson in how to use light to create beauty. Yet Kerstens maintains that his work isn’t about beauty; he says the contradiction between beauty and ugliness “disappears the moment the soul is touched.” His work, he has said, is about the soul.

I’m not sure how Kerstens reconciles his fascination with craftsmanship and his notion that his work is about the soul. I’m not sure I see much of the soul in his photography. I’m not sure what the soul is, or even if it exists. But I recognize beauty — and it’s here in abundance.

Kerstens5

I’m very much taken by these photographs. They’re so simple, so still, and so intimate. But I can’t help wondering — would they be as successful with another model? Would they work as well without the heavy-lidded intensity and clarity of Paula’s gaze, staring directly into the lens, directly at the viewer?

I’m inclined to think there’s a special, intangible alchemy at work here. The relationship between father and daughter, between photographer and model, between past and present, between tradition and modernity, between craft and art, between light and shadow — they all seem to have coalesced in this series of images.

I don’t know — maybe these photographs really are about the soul.